STU 3 Candidate

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.4.0: STU 3 Ballot 3). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Pcd-example-notOrg.xml

Raw XML (canonical form)

Consent to share except to withhold or withdraw consent for disclosure to an organization. (id = "pcd-example-notOrg")

<Contract xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="pcd-example-notOrg"/>

  <text>
    <status value="generated"/>
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing jurisdictional policy and are realized in
       existing systems in Canada. 
  The default policy is one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios
       all deal with withdrawal or withholding consent for that purpose. 
  In other jurisdictions, where an express consent model is used (Opt-In), these would
       examples would contain the phrase &quot;consent to&quot; rather 
  than &quot;withhold&quot; or &quot;withdraw&quot; consent for.
    <p>
  specific to use-case 3) Withhold or withdraw consent for disclosure to a specific provider
         organization  
  </p><p>
    Patient &quot;P. van de Heuvel&quot; ex-spouse is a Physician that is employed by
         Good Health Clinic.  P. decides
   that he would like to withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of his health
         information 
   to Good Health Clinic.
   </p>
   </div>
  </text>

  <issued value="2015-11-18"/>
 <!--   not bound by a timeframe - Contract.applies   -->
 
  <subject>
    <reference value="Patient/f001"/>
    <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/>
  </subject>

  <!--   I assume the example given is Canada Infoway wide???  AND I assume it is desired to
   state that in the Contract.authority element   -->
  <authority>
      <reference value="Organization/Infoway"/>
    <display value="Canada Infoway"/>
   </authority>
    
   <!--   and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example
   on UK Pharamacy Juristiction)   -->
  <domain>
      <reference value="Location/Infoway"/>
    <display value="Canada Infoway"/>
   </domain>
   
  <type>
     <coding>
     <system value="http://loinc.org"/>
     <code value="57016-8"/>
   </coding>
  </type>

  <!--   made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published
   by Canada Infoway   -->
  <subType>
     <coding>
     <system value="http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes"/>
     <code value="Opt-In"/>
     <display value="Default Authorization with exceptions."/>
   </coding>
  </subType>
 
  <term>
     <type>
       <coding>
       <!--   made up code system   -->
       <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/>
       <code value="withhold-from"/>
     <display value="Withhold all data from specified actor entity."/>
     </coding>
   </type>
   <topic>
         <reference value="Organization/2.16.840.1.113883.19.5"/>
           <display value="Good Health Clinic"/>
   </topic>
     <!--   by not specifying term.actor I assume this means everyone?   -->
   <text value="Withhold this order and any results or related objects from any provider."/>
   </term>
   <!--   the terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak   -->
   <friendly>
     <contentAttachment>
     <title value="The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak."/>
     <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->
   </contentAttachment>
   </friendly>
   <!--   the legal terms of the consent in lawyer speak   -->
   <legal>
     <contentAttachment>
     <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/>
     <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->
     <!--   I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent
       is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html   -->
   </contentAttachment>
   </legal>
</Contract>

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.